Review #145384 about “"Integrated Camera"”
Author: Barna
Webcam: "Integrated Camera"
Rating: Poor (2 out of 5)
Date:
Advantages of the webcam:
At least there is one.
Disadvantages of the webcam:
Everything else. Poor quality. My phone from 2005 had better camera resolution. Video quality at 12 FPS and tremendous amount of motion blur takes you back to 2007 vibes, which should only be good if you paid 2007 prices for it.
Author’s comment:
The rest of the notebook is fine, but the webcam is crap. I only give "poor" rating and not awful, because I've seen worse, but only in budget laptops. This should be higher tier. My much cheaper phone has waaay, way better front camera.
At least there is one.
Disadvantages of the webcam:
Everything else. Poor quality. My phone from 2005 had better camera resolution. Video quality at 12 FPS and tremendous amount of motion blur takes you back to 2007 vibes, which should only be good if you paid 2007 prices for it.
Author’s comment:
The rest of the notebook is fine, but the webcam is crap. I only give "poor" rating and not awful, because I've seen worse, but only in budget laptops. This should be higher tier. My much cheaper phone has waaay, way better front camera.
Webcam Information
Webcam Name: | Integrated Camera |
---|---|
Type of Webcam: | Integrated |
Quality Rank: | #67994 |
Quality Rating: | 193 |
Built-in Microphone: | — |
Built-in Speaker: | — |
Frame rate: | 12 FPS |
Stream Type: | Video |
Image Mode: | RGB Color |
Webcam MegaPixels: | 0.92 MP |
Webcam Resolution: | 1280×720 |
Video Standard: | HD |
Aspect Ratio: | 1.78 |
PNG File Size: | 1.06 MB |
JPEG File Size: | 587.64 KB |
Bitrate: | 6.89 MB/s |
Number of Colors: | 121480 |
Average RGB Color: | |
Lightness: | 45.49% |
Luminosity: | 45.6% |
Brightness: | 45.49% |
Hue: | 30° |
Saturation: | 1.72% |
Device Information
Device Name | LENOVO LOQ 15IRH8 |
---|---|
Device Type | Laptop |
Screen Resolution | 1707×960 |
Color Depth | 24-bit |
Screen Orientation | landscape-primary |